<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Apple Posts New iPhone Ads</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.theiphoneblog.com/2007/10/08/apple-posts-new-iphone-ads/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.theiphoneblog.com/2007/10/08/apple-posts-new-iphone-ads/</link>
	<description>For people who dare to Phone Different.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 23 Nov 2009 08:15:04 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: duanedude1</title>
		<link>http://www.theiphoneblog.com/2007/10/08/apple-posts-new-iphone-ads/comment-page-1/#comment-4891</link>
		<dc:creator>duanedude1</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Oct 2007 09:35:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theiphoneblog.com/2007/10/08/apple-posts-new-iphone-ads/#comment-4891</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;These ads are so, so lame...&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Touting as new and kewl stuff we&#039;ve been able to do on our other devices for years!  It is one thing to sell a shiny new interface and name... but really an insult to the viewers intelligence to insinuate that most of the stuff the iphone does is in any way new.  Yes, kiddo, it&#039;s neat to be able to call up a website to look up some information, but where were you the last few years when we&#039;ve allredy been doing that stuff (yawn!)? &lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Maybe it is not an insult to people&#039;s intelligence ifthey are the kind who would buy on the basis of a name or nifty interface alone.... maybe they deserve to be duped?  There&#039;s one born every minute!&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>These ads are so, so lame&#8230;</p>

<p>Touting as new and kewl stuff we&#8217;ve been able to do on our other devices for years!  It is one thing to sell a shiny new interface and name&#8230; but really an insult to the viewers intelligence to insinuate that most of the stuff the iphone does is in any way new.  Yes, kiddo, it&#8217;s neat to be able to call up a website to look up some information, but where were you the last few years when we&#8217;ve allredy been doing that stuff (yawn!)? </p>

<p>Maybe it is not an insult to people&#8217;s intelligence ifthey are the kind who would buy on the basis of a name or nifty interface alone&#8230;. maybe they deserve to be duped?  There&#8217;s one born every minute!</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

