<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Apple Event Planned for End of February</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.theiphoneblog.com/2008/02/08/apple-event-planned-for-end-of-february/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.theiphoneblog.com/2008/02/08/apple-event-planned-for-end-of-february/</link>
	<description>For people who dare to Phone Different.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 23 Nov 2009 02:48:11 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Rene Ritchie</title>
		<link>http://www.theiphoneblog.com/2008/02/08/apple-event-planned-for-end-of-february/comment-page-1/#comment-5463</link>
		<dc:creator>Rene Ritchie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Feb 2008 08:34:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theiphoneblog.com/2008/02/08/apple-event-planned-for-end-of-february/#comment-5463</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Erica Sadun, from TUAW, weighs in with rumors of an SDK delay, fears of a &quot;sandbox&quot;, and tantalizing code hints at a second iPhone device and a &quot;simulator&quot;:&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;&quot;http://www.tuaw.com/2008/02/07/will-the-iphone-sdk-offer-a-built-in-simulator/&quot;&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;http://www.tuaw.com/2008/02/07/will-the-iphone-sdk-offer-a-built-in-simulator/&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;table width=100% bgcolor=lightgray&gt;&lt;tr&gt;&lt;td bgcolor=white&gt;When reverse engineering, it&#039;s sometimes hard to figure out exactly what you&#039;re looking at, and what it all means. For example, the iPhone&#039;s supported platforms include the following.

Platforms = (M68, N82, simulator); 
Platforms = (N45);

We know what the M68 platform is. It&#039;s the iPhone. And we know what N45 is, the iPod touch. So what&#039;s the N82? Could it be another member of the iPhone family? Perhaps. It&#039;s hard to make that call without any more data -- so rather than worry about N82, let&#039;s consider the next entry: &quot;simulator.&quot;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;/tr&gt;&lt;/table&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Erica Sadun, from TUAW, weighs in with rumors of an SDK delay, fears of a &#8220;sandbox&#8221;, and tantalizing code hints at a second iPhone device and a &#8220;simulator&#8221;:</p>

<p><a href=""http://www.tuaw.com/2008/02/07/will-the-iphone-sdk-offer-a-built-in-simulator/"" target="_blank">http://www.tuaw.com/2008/02/07/will-the-iphone-sdk-offer-a-built-in-simulator/</a></p>

<table width=100% bgcolor=lightgray><tr><td bgcolor=white>When reverse engineering, it&#8217;s sometimes hard to figure out exactly what you&#8217;re looking at, and what it all means. For example, the iPhone&#8217;s supported platforms include the following.

Platforms = (M68, N82, simulator); 
Platforms = (N45);

We know what the M68 platform is. It&#8217;s the iPhone. And we know what N45 is, the iPod touch. So what&#8217;s the N82? Could it be another member of the iPhone family? Perhaps. It&#8217;s hard to make that call without any more data &#8212; so rather than worry about N82, let&#8217;s consider the next entry: &#8220;simulator.&#8221;</td></tr></table>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: surur</title>
		<link>http://www.theiphoneblog.com/2008/02/08/apple-event-planned-for-end-of-february/comment-page-1/#comment-5462</link>
		<dc:creator>surur</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Feb 2008 08:28:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theiphoneblog.com/2008/02/08/apple-event-planned-for-end-of-february/#comment-5462</guid>
		<description>&lt;table width=100% bgcolor=lightgray&gt;&lt;tr&gt;&lt;td bgcolor=white&gt;
So let&#039;s join the bandwagon and assume it&#039;ll be an SDK event.  Cool.  Now the real question, the one that put an icy lump of fear and doubt into our hearts during the last &lt;a href=&quot;http://phonedifferent.com/2008/02/phone_different_podcast_11.html&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;Phone different podcast&lt;/a&gt;: what if it&#039;s just an announcement of an SDK for developers, that Apple won&#039;t let the apps on for another 6 months? &lt;/td&gt;&lt;/tr&gt;&lt;/table&gt;

&lt;p&gt;I would be much more worried about the API being very restrictive, and the apps therefore not really being &quot;native&quot;. I can imagine Apple, who likes their look and feel very much, would not be too happy with Summerboard.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Surur&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<table width=100% bgcolor=lightgray><tr><td bgcolor=white>
So let&#8217;s join the bandwagon and assume it&#8217;ll be an SDK event.  Cool.  Now the real question, the one that put an icy lump of fear and doubt into our hearts during the last <a href="http://phonedifferent.com/2008/02/phone_different_podcast_11.html" target="_blank">Phone different podcast</a>: what if it&#8217;s just an announcement of an SDK for developers, that Apple won&#8217;t let the apps on for another 6 months? </td></tr></table>

<p>I would be much more worried about the API being very restrictive, and the apps therefore not really being &#8220;native&#8221;. I can imagine Apple, who likes their look and feel very much, would not be too happy with Summerboard.</p>

<p>Surur</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

