<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: AT&amp;T takes over Starbucks &#8211; iPhone access next?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.theiphoneblog.com/2008/02/11/att-takes-over-starbucks-iphone-access-next/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.theiphoneblog.com/2008/02/11/att-takes-over-starbucks-iphone-access-next/</link>
	<description>For people who dare to Phone Different.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 23 Nov 2009 03:54:14 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Rene Ritchie</title>
		<link>http://www.theiphoneblog.com/2008/02/11/att-takes-over-starbucks-iphone-access-next/comment-page-1/#comment-5476</link>
		<dc:creator>Rene Ritchie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 Feb 2008 12:21:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theiphoneblog.com/2008/02/11/att-takes-over-starbucks-iphone-access-next/#comment-5476</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;MacEnstein is posting a bunch of crazy stuff around this:&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.macenstein.com/default/&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;http://www.macenstein.com/default/&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;ul&gt;
&lt;li&gt;&lt;p&gt;Including AT&amp;T recommending using iPhone on 3G&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;&lt;p&gt;Outlandish speculation that the new 16gb iPhone has firmware-unlockable 3G&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;&lt;p&gt;And AT&amp;T hotspots + 700mhz auction = iPhone skipping 3G and going straight to blanket WiFi/700mhz&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;/ul&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>MacEnstein is posting a bunch of crazy stuff around this:</p>

<p><a href="http://www.macenstein.com/default/" target="_blank">http://www.macenstein.com/default/</a></p>

<ul>
<li><p>Including AT&amp;T recommending using iPhone on 3G</p></li>
<li><p>Outlandish speculation that the new 16gb iPhone has firmware-unlockable 3G</p></li>
<li><p>And AT&amp;T hotspots + 700mhz auction = iPhone skipping 3G and going straight to blanket WiFi/700mhz</p></li>
</ul>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mikec</title>
		<link>http://www.theiphoneblog.com/2008/02/11/att-takes-over-starbucks-iphone-access-next/comment-page-1/#comment-5475</link>
		<dc:creator>mikec</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 Feb 2008 11:39:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theiphoneblog.com/2008/02/11/att-takes-over-starbucks-iphone-access-next/#comment-5475</guid>
		<description>&lt;table width=100% bgcolor=lightgray&gt;&lt;tr&gt;&lt;td bgcolor=white&gt;AT&amp;T announced today that starting this spring they will run Starbucks&#039; 7000 wifi networks in the US. Existing T-Mobile hotspot customers need not worry, as Starbucks made sure that AT&amp;T continues to allow T-Mobile users access free of charge. 

Of course, most iPhone users don&#039;t use T-Mobile, so AT&amp;T tantalising adds that they will &quot;soon extend the benefits of Wi-Fi at Starbucks to its [own] wireless customers.&quot; That, and free access for AT&amp;T Uverse (DSL) customers, a huge price drop ($4 for $2 hours, vs. $6/hour, $10 a day on T-Mobile), and 2 hours of free access for all customers who used a Starbucks Card to purchase their drinks, certainly doesn&#039;t make this deal seem too shabby. 

&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.att.com/gen/press-room?pid=4800&amp;cdvn=news&amp;newsarticleid=25152&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;AT&amp;T Press release&lt;/a&gt;
&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.businesswire.com/portal/site/google/index.jsp?ndmViewId=news_view&amp;newsId=20080211005514&amp;newsLang=en&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;Starbucks Press release&lt;/a&gt;
&lt;a href=&quot;http://flickr.com/photos/elliottcable/1843829894/&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;Photo Credit&lt;/a&gt; 

Read more at &lt;a href=&quot;&quot;http://www.phonedifferent.com/2008/02/att_takes_over_starbucks_iphon.html&quot;&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;http://www.phonedifferent.com/2008/02/att_takes_over_starbucks_iphon.html&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;/tr&gt;&lt;/table&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Interesting; does this mean every tx on your Starbucks card gets you 2 hours? Or only 1 per day.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Seems like bad news for T-Mobile.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<table width=100% bgcolor=lightgray><tr><td bgcolor=white>AT&#038;T announced today that starting this spring they will run Starbucks&#8217; 7000 wifi networks in the US. Existing T-Mobile hotspot customers need not worry, as Starbucks made sure that AT&#038;T continues to allow T-Mobile users access free of charge. 

Of course, most iPhone users don&#8217;t use T-Mobile, so AT&#038;T tantalising adds that they will &#8220;soon extend the benefits of Wi-Fi at Starbucks to its [own] wireless customers.&#8221; That, and free access for AT&#038;T Uverse (DSL) customers, a huge price drop ($4 for $2 hours, vs. $6/hour, $10 a day on T-Mobile), and 2 hours of free access for all customers who used a Starbucks Card to purchase their drinks, certainly doesn&#8217;t make this deal seem too shabby. 

<a href="http://www.att.com/gen/press-room?pid=4800&#038;cdvn=news&#038;newsarticleid=25152" target="_blank">AT&#038;T Press release</a>
<a href="http://www.businesswire.com/portal/site/google/index.jsp?ndmViewId=news_view&#038;newsId=20080211005514&#038;newsLang=en" target="_blank">Starbucks Press release</a>
<a href="http://flickr.com/photos/elliottcable/1843829894/" target="_blank">Photo Credit</a> 

Read more at <a href=""http://www.phonedifferent.com/2008/02/att_takes_over_starbucks_iphon.html"" target="_blank">http://www.phonedifferent.com/2008/02/att_takes_over_starbucks_iphon.html</a></td></tr></table>

<p>Interesting; does this mean every tx on your Starbucks card gets you 2 hours? Or only 1 per day.</p>

<p>Seems like bad news for T-Mobile.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

