<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Walt Mossberg: 3G iPhone, t-minus 60 days</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.theiphoneblog.com/2008/04/06/walt-mossberg-3g-iphone-t-minus-60-days/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.theiphoneblog.com/2008/04/06/walt-mossberg-3g-iphone-t-minus-60-days/</link>
	<description>For people who dare to Phone Different.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 23 Nov 2009 11:23:23 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: cmaier</title>
		<link>http://www.theiphoneblog.com/2008/04/06/walt-mossberg-3g-iphone-t-minus-60-days/comment-page-1/#comment-6132</link>
		<dc:creator>cmaier</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 06 Apr 2008 15:10:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theiphoneblog.com/2008/04/06/walt-mossberg-3g-iphone-t-minus-60-days/#comment-6132</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Where does it even say that existing phones would be able to take advantage of the speed increase? I doubt that.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Where does it even say that existing phones would be able to take advantage of the speed increase? I doubt that.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rene Ritchie</title>
		<link>http://www.theiphoneblog.com/2008/04/06/walt-mossberg-3g-iphone-t-minus-60-days/comment-page-1/#comment-6131</link>
		<dc:creator>Rene Ritchie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 06 Apr 2008 14:55:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theiphoneblog.com/2008/04/06/walt-mossberg-3g-iphone-t-minus-60-days/#comment-6131</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;&quot;http://phonedifferent.com/2008/03/x2_edgeing_faster.html&quot;&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;http://phonedifferent.com/2008/03/x2&lt;em&gt;edgeing&lt;/em&gt;faster.html&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;I don&#039;t think there&#039;s been any word on AT&amp;T implementing this technology, has there?&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href=""http://phonedifferent.com/2008/03/x2_edgeing_faster.html"" target="_blank"></a><a href="http://phonedifferent.com/2008/03/x2" rel="nofollow">http://phonedifferent.com/2008/03/x2</a><em>edgeing</em>faster.html</p>

<p>I don&#8217;t think there&#8217;s been any word on AT&amp;T implementing this technology, has there?</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: dstrauss</title>
		<link>http://www.theiphoneblog.com/2008/04/06/walt-mossberg-3g-iphone-t-minus-60-days/comment-page-1/#comment-6130</link>
		<dc:creator>dstrauss</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 06 Apr 2008 13:47:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theiphoneblog.com/2008/04/06/walt-mossberg-3g-iphone-t-minus-60-days/#comment-6130</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;[quote=Draiko;1429480]also don&#039;t forget that &lt;strong&gt;EDGE is going to get a speed boost&lt;/strong&gt; to low-end 3G speeds (600kbps)... this seems to be more likely than Apple introducing a whole new iPhone soon...&lt;/td&gt;&lt;/tr&gt;&lt;/table&gt;&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Source? How soon? System-wide? A 600kbs EDGE connection would be adequate for most needs short of streaming video, and I&#039;m sure less expensive than full on 3g (if you leave it up to AT&amp;T).&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[quote=Draiko;1429480]also don&#8217;t forget that <strong>EDGE is going to get a speed boost</strong> to low-end 3G speeds (600kbps)&#8230; this seems to be more likely than Apple introducing a whole new iPhone soon&#8230;</p>

<p>Source? How soon? System-wide? A 600kbs EDGE connection would be adequate for most needs short of streaming video, and I&#8217;m sure less expensive than full on 3g (if you leave it up to AT&amp;T).</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Draiko</title>
		<link>http://www.theiphoneblog.com/2008/04/06/walt-mossberg-3g-iphone-t-minus-60-days/comment-page-1/#comment-6129</link>
		<dc:creator>Draiko</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 06 Apr 2008 12:40:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theiphoneblog.com/2008/04/06/walt-mossberg-3g-iphone-t-minus-60-days/#comment-6129</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;also don&#039;t forget that EDGE is going to get a speed boost to low-end 3G speeds (600kbps)... this seems to be more likely than Apple introducing a whole new iPhone soon.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;The iPhone is still going to be sluggish compared to other phones with EVDO Rev A... at least with boosted EDGE it will be fast enough to load most websites in under 30 seconds. I wonder if that will be good enough.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>also don&#8217;t forget that EDGE is going to get a speed boost to low-end 3G speeds (600kbps)&#8230; this seems to be more likely than Apple introducing a whole new iPhone soon.</p>

<p>The iPhone is still going to be sluggish compared to other phones with EVDO Rev A&#8230; at least with boosted EDGE it will be fast enough to load most websites in under 30 seconds. I wonder if that will be good enough.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bad Ash</title>
		<link>http://www.theiphoneblog.com/2008/04/06/walt-mossberg-3g-iphone-t-minus-60-days/comment-page-1/#comment-6128</link>
		<dc:creator>Bad Ash</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 06 Apr 2008 07:35:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theiphoneblog.com/2008/04/06/walt-mossberg-3g-iphone-t-minus-60-days/#comment-6128</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Dont forget good ol Walt also said last year we&#039;d have flash within months of the iPhones release.... So obviously he&#039;s not always right.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dont forget good ol Walt also said last year we&#8217;d have flash within months of the iPhones release&#8230;. So obviously he&#8217;s not always right.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rene Ritchie</title>
		<link>http://www.theiphoneblog.com/2008/04/06/walt-mossberg-3g-iphone-t-minus-60-days/comment-page-1/#comment-6127</link>
		<dc:creator>Rene Ritchie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 06 Apr 2008 05:02:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theiphoneblog.com/2008/04/06/walt-mossberg-3g-iphone-t-minus-60-days/#comment-6127</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Sounds too soon, but Uncle Walt is the Mac Daddy of Journo.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Will it be Chad&#039;s Vader-looking version?&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;(I love it when meme&#039;s come together...)&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sounds too soon, but Uncle Walt is the Mac Daddy of Journo.</p>

<p>Will it be Chad&#8217;s Vader-looking version?</p>

<p>(I love it when meme&#8217;s come together&#8230;)</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: marcol</title>
		<link>http://www.theiphoneblog.com/2008/04/06/walt-mossberg-3g-iphone-t-minus-60-days/comment-page-1/#comment-6126</link>
		<dc:creator>marcol</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 06 Apr 2008 00:38:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theiphoneblog.com/2008/04/06/walt-mossberg-3g-iphone-t-minus-60-days/#comment-6126</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;If asked to guess I would have said 2.0 software = 3G software, but there&#039;s no real reason for that I suppose. 3G could easily be rolled into a 1.x release. It even makes some sort of sense to have the next gen hardware out before the SDK comes out of beta. Walt seems to be very sure of this.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If asked to guess I would have said 2.0 software = 3G software, but there&#8217;s no real reason for that I suppose. 3G could easily be rolled into a 1.x release. It even makes some sort of sense to have the next gen hardware out before the SDK comes out of beta. Walt seems to be very sure of this.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

