<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Opera Was the Original Browser&#8230; For the iPhone?!</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.theiphoneblog.com/2008/09/17/opera-was-the-original-browser-for-the-iphone/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.theiphoneblog.com/2008/09/17/opera-was-the-original-browser-for-the-iphone/</link>
	<description>For people who dare to Phone Different.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 23 Nov 2009 09:31:11 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: MUW</title>
		<link>http://www.theiphoneblog.com/2008/09/17/opera-was-the-original-browser-for-the-iphone/comment-page-1/#comment-15216</link>
		<dc:creator>MUW</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Sep 2008 11:20:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theiphoneblog.com/?p=4446#comment-15216</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;@Stephen&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Opera doesn&#039;t have just .1 percent market share. Its small, but not &lt;em&gt;that&lt;/em&gt; small. I don&#039;t know how you got that .1% figure.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Plus, Opera agreeing to Apple would have been akin to making a deal with the devil as apple would have liked Opera not to distribute the browser to other phones. And tying yourself to just one phone is never a good idea.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;I think Opera is helping much more people by being on a variety of phones. Plus acording to their mobile reports, Opera Mini is the worlds most popular mobile browser, so I guess its working out fine for opera as well.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Stephen</p>

<p>Opera doesn&#8217;t have just .1 percent market share. Its small, but not <em>that</em> small. I don&#8217;t know how you got that .1% figure.</p>

<p>Plus, Opera agreeing to Apple would have been akin to making a deal with the devil as apple would have liked Opera not to distribute the browser to other phones. And tying yourself to just one phone is never a good idea.</p>

<p>I think Opera is helping much more people by being on a variety of phones. Plus acording to their mobile reports, Opera Mini is the worlds most popular mobile browser, so I guess its working out fine for opera as well.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: eArTh</title>
		<link>http://www.theiphoneblog.com/2008/09/17/opera-was-the-original-browser-for-the-iphone/comment-page-1/#comment-15172</link>
		<dc:creator>eArTh</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Sep 2008 01:06:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theiphoneblog.com/?p=4446#comment-15172</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;@stephen&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;I totally agree with you. It seems a little hard for me to believe that apple was looking to put opera on the iPhone. That wouldn&#039;t really fit in the whole apple ecosystem breakdown now would it.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@stephen</p>

<p>I totally agree with you. It seems a little hard for me to believe that apple was looking to put opera on the iPhone. That wouldn&#8217;t really fit in the whole apple ecosystem breakdown now would it.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stephen</title>
		<link>http://www.theiphoneblog.com/2008/09/17/opera-was-the-original-browser-for-the-iphone/comment-page-1/#comment-15171</link>
		<dc:creator>Stephen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Sep 2008 00:33:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theiphoneblog.com/?p=4446#comment-15171</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;This is ridiculous. First off Valleywag does not have a rep for being even remotely accurate. Opera is NOT based on webkit that Safari and Mobile Safari are. Opera Mobile does not look or act like Mobile Safari as well as not sharing the same engine. &lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Next Apple had Safari running on the Mac for years and even Windows before the iPhone was a product. Do you really believe that Apple would release the iPhone without their own browser on it? Especially being that is was pushed as a huge selling point of the iPhone. I don&#039;t. &lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Reading Valleywag is like reading the tech version of the Globe or the Star that you find in your local supermarket, catchy headlines with little truth or facts.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Opera has less than .1 of the browser market and would have been in no position to turn anyone down. What is also funny is that several other mobile phones are looking at webkit to use as their mobile browser, even ones running on Windows Mobile.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is ridiculous. First off Valleywag does not have a rep for being even remotely accurate. Opera is NOT based on webkit that Safari and Mobile Safari are. Opera Mobile does not look or act like Mobile Safari as well as not sharing the same engine. </p>

<p>Next Apple had Safari running on the Mac for years and even Windows before the iPhone was a product. Do you really believe that Apple would release the iPhone without their own browser on it? Especially being that is was pushed as a huge selling point of the iPhone. I don&#8217;t. </p>

<p>Reading Valleywag is like reading the tech version of the Globe or the Star that you find in your local supermarket, catchy headlines with little truth or facts.</p>

<p>Opera has less than .1 of the browser market and would have been in no position to turn anyone down. What is also funny is that several other mobile phones are looking at webkit to use as their mobile browser, even ones running on Windows Mobile.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mr. Hi Definition</title>
		<link>http://www.theiphoneblog.com/2008/09/17/opera-was-the-original-browser-for-the-iphone/comment-page-1/#comment-15154</link>
		<dc:creator>mr. Hi Definition</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Sep 2008 20:51:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theiphoneblog.com/?p=4446#comment-15154</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Well, well, that&#039;s pretty interesting. Opera rejected Apple... I bet they wish they didn&#039;t do that now. I&#039;m glad they did though, Mobile Safari is the best mobile browser out.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, well, that&#8217;s pretty interesting. Opera rejected Apple&#8230; I bet they wish they didn&#8217;t do that now. I&#8217;m glad they did though, Mobile Safari is the best mobile browser out.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: frog</title>
		<link>http://www.theiphoneblog.com/2008/09/17/opera-was-the-original-browser-for-the-iphone/comment-page-1/#comment-15152</link>
		<dc:creator>frog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Sep 2008 20:49:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theiphoneblog.com/?p=4446#comment-15152</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;It would be fair to say Safari mobile does appear to act and look an awful lot like Opera.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It would be fair to say Safari mobile does appear to act and look an awful lot like Opera.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

