<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: CEOh-Snap! McNamee Says Come June, All iPhone Owners Will Become Pre-verts!</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.theiphoneblog.com/2009/03/06/ceohsnap-mcnamee-june-iphone-owners-preverts/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.theiphoneblog.com/2009/03/06/ceohsnap-mcnamee-june-iphone-owners-preverts/</link>
	<description>For people who dare to Phone Different.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 23 Nov 2009 02:32:19 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Jason</title>
		<link>http://www.theiphoneblog.com/2009/03/06/ceohsnap-mcnamee-june-iphone-owners-preverts/comment-page-1/#comment-34749</link>
		<dc:creator>Jason</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Mar 2009 19:08:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theiphoneblog.com/?p=7384#comment-34749</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;@mrp&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;There are some things coming in the Pre that can be said to be better than any of the iPhones simply because those features simply don&#039;t exist in the iPhones.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;The biggest of these is multi-tasking, specifically the ability to jump from app to app without losing any app&#039;s context. For a phone that is &quot;based on OS-X&quot;, the lack of multi-tasking in this form seems a bit...surprising.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Another biggie is the unobtrusive, non-taking-over-your-screen notifications. Not only that, the system is available to &lt;em&gt;any&lt;/em&gt; application, not just the ones the phone&#039;s designers make (I don&#039;t remember where I read about that second bit as an iPhone app limitation, that their notification system can mostly only be used by Apple&#039;s apps).&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Smaller things that may or may not float your boat:&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;ul&gt;
&lt;li&gt;&lt;p&gt;Copy/Cut-paste...without jail-breaking your phone. Based on a Mac OS, and no copy/cut-paste? Seriously?!&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;&lt;p&gt;Removable battery. Want more power than the phone&#039;s designers think is sufficient for &lt;em&gt;everybody&lt;/em&gt;? Think you use your phone more than the next guy, or think you just want more battery life? You&#039;ll be able to get a more powerful battery and use that one instead of the original. Or maybe you&#039;re geeky enough to want to carry a spare battery around to swap in when the other one runs out on you; you&#039;re free to do that, too. Or even just go with what they give you... But notice something? It&#039;s up to you.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;/ul&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@mrp</p>

<p>There are some things coming in the Pre that can be said to be better than any of the iPhones simply because those features simply don&#8217;t exist in the iPhones.</p>

<p>The biggest of these is multi-tasking, specifically the ability to jump from app to app without losing any app&#8217;s context. For a phone that is &#8220;based on OS-X&#8221;, the lack of multi-tasking in this form seems a bit&#8230;surprising.</p>

<p>Another biggie is the unobtrusive, non-taking-over-your-screen notifications. Not only that, the system is available to <em>any</em> application, not just the ones the phone&#8217;s designers make (I don&#8217;t remember where I read about that second bit as an iPhone app limitation, that their notification system can mostly only be used by Apple&#8217;s apps).</p>

<p>Smaller things that may or may not float your boat:</p>

<ul>
<li><p>Copy/Cut-paste&#8230;without jail-breaking your phone. Based on a Mac OS, and no copy/cut-paste? Seriously?!</p></li>
<li><p>Removable battery. Want more power than the phone&#8217;s designers think is sufficient for <em>everybody</em>? Think you use your phone more than the next guy, or think you just want more battery life? You&#8217;ll be able to get a more powerful battery and use that one instead of the original. Or maybe you&#8217;re geeky enough to want to carry a spare battery around to swap in when the other one runs out on you; you&#8217;re free to do that, too. Or even just go with what they give you&#8230; But notice something? It&#8217;s up to you.</p></li>
</ul>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: STUstone08</title>
		<link>http://www.theiphoneblog.com/2009/03/06/ceohsnap-mcnamee-june-iphone-owners-preverts/comment-page-1/#comment-34400</link>
		<dc:creator>STUstone08</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 07 Mar 2009 01:58:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theiphoneblog.com/?p=7384#comment-34400</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;love it! Nothing wrong with healthy competition, it can only lead to a better iPhone&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>love it! Nothing wrong with healthy competition, it can only lead to a better iPhone</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Paul</title>
		<link>http://www.theiphoneblog.com/2009/03/06/ceohsnap-mcnamee-june-iphone-owners-preverts/comment-page-1/#comment-34394</link>
		<dc:creator>Paul</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 07 Mar 2009 01:08:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theiphoneblog.com/?p=7384#comment-34394</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;I&#039;d &quot;consider&quot; switching if it wasn&#039;t tied to Sprint.  I had Sprint and the service was terrible. Now I&#039;ll be upgrading to the next version of the iPhone.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;d &#8220;consider&#8221; switching if it wasn&#8217;t tied to Sprint.  I had Sprint and the service was terrible. Now I&#8217;ll be upgrading to the next version of the iPhone.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: frog</title>
		<link>http://www.theiphoneblog.com/2009/03/06/ceohsnap-mcnamee-june-iphone-owners-preverts/comment-page-1/#comment-34376</link>
		<dc:creator>frog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Mar 2009 19:22:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theiphoneblog.com/?p=7384#comment-34376</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Problem is the iPhones main selling point is that it&#039;s an iPod too.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Problem is the iPhones main selling point is that it&#8217;s an iPod too.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mrp</title>
		<link>http://www.theiphoneblog.com/2009/03/06/ceohsnap-mcnamee-june-iphone-owners-preverts/comment-page-1/#comment-34362</link>
		<dc:creator>mrp</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Mar 2009 17:39:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theiphoneblog.com/?p=7384#comment-34362</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Hey cardfan...thanks for throwing all your knowledge at us...but why would we care what you say? And don&#039;t bash or talk down our iPhones on this our home site. And just a thought... The Pre isn&#039;t even in the hands of the public yet- don&#039;t you think you should wait untill it&#039;s actually being used by consumers before you start telling us how it&#039;s &quot;better&quot;? &quot;You&quot; people are so arrogant in your claims and hype- but have nothing to really support you yet. Oh my bad- maybe your just really confident in Palms recent smartphone prowess-I mean the centro&#039;s pretty awesome(pause...pause...wait for it...and lose it) haasaaaaaaaahhhhhaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa- right!&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey cardfan&#8230;thanks for throwing all your knowledge at us&#8230;but why would we care what you say? And don&#8217;t bash or talk down our iPhones on this our home site. And just a thought&#8230; The Pre isn&#8217;t even in the hands of the public yet- don&#8217;t you think you should wait untill it&#8217;s actually being used by consumers before you start telling us how it&#8217;s &#8220;better&#8221;? &#8220;You&#8221; people are so arrogant in your claims and hype- but have nothing to really support you yet. Oh my bad- maybe your just really confident in Palms recent smartphone prowess-I mean the centro&#8217;s pretty awesome(pause&#8230;pause&#8230;wait for it&#8230;and lose it) haasaaaaaaaahhhhhaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa- right!</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steve</title>
		<link>http://www.theiphoneblog.com/2009/03/06/ceohsnap-mcnamee-june-iphone-owners-preverts/comment-page-1/#comment-34359</link>
		<dc:creator>Steve</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Mar 2009 17:22:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theiphoneblog.com/?p=7384#comment-34359</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;@Cardfan:&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Uhh, no... YOU&quot;RE not too bright. Ever try to get a wireless card that works with a Mac back in the day? Sprint&#039;s reaction: &quot;Mac? what&#039;s a Mac? Is that one of those weird Apple thingys?&quot;&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;I had Sprint for 11 years! F**k &#039;em, now! :lol:&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Cardfan:</p>

<p>Uhh, no&#8230; YOU&#8221;RE not too bright. Ever try to get a wireless card that works with a Mac back in the day? Sprint&#8217;s reaction: &#8220;Mac? what&#8217;s a Mac? Is that one of those weird Apple thingys?&#8221;</p>

<p>I had Sprint for 11 years! F**k &#8216;em, now! <img src='http://www.theiphoneblog.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_lol.gif' alt=':lol:' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mystic</title>
		<link>http://www.theiphoneblog.com/2009/03/06/ceohsnap-mcnamee-june-iphone-owners-preverts/comment-page-1/#comment-34356</link>
		<dc:creator>mystic</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Mar 2009 17:08:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theiphoneblog.com/?p=7384#comment-34356</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Oh Cardfan, do you really think it&#039;s spiffy calendars that sell smartphones? You are funny.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh Cardfan, do you really think it&#8217;s spiffy calendars that sell smartphones? You are funny.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: M. Elwan</title>
		<link>http://www.theiphoneblog.com/2009/03/06/ceohsnap-mcnamee-june-iphone-owners-preverts/comment-page-1/#comment-34351</link>
		<dc:creator>M. Elwan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Mar 2009 16:57:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theiphoneblog.com/?p=7384#comment-34351</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;&quot;All iPhone owners will switch&quot;? That&#039;s a bold statement from a hippy lol&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;All iPhone owners will switch&#8221;? That&#8217;s a bold statement from a hippy lol</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: cardfan</title>
		<link>http://www.theiphoneblog.com/2009/03/06/ceohsnap-mcnamee-june-iphone-owners-preverts/comment-page-1/#comment-34346</link>
		<dc:creator>cardfan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Mar 2009 16:07:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theiphoneblog.com/?p=7384#comment-34346</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;He meant the original iphone owners although if those owners didn&#039;t switch to the iphone 3g by now, it&#039;s doubtful they would be the types to switch to the more advanced Pre.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Some you crack me up though.  Sprint is much better than AT&amp;T, better quality, faster speed, more 3g coverage.  Not to mention better priced plans.  The iphone succeeds despite AT&amp;T..not because of AT&amp;T.  That&#039;s a credit to the iphone.  If you think otherwise, then you&#039;re not too bright but we do live in a nation of &quot;not too bright.&quot;&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;The Pre will be superior in its own way but won&#039;t touch the itunes experience that apple offers.  Other compelling features as well as the missing basics that the iphone lacks will sell the Pre.  &lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Finally, apple won&#039;t be releasing anything noteworthy in July.  Definitely not multitasking as there is no compelling need for it from users and would require much better hardware while alienating users of the iphone and iphone 3g.  &lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Rumors abound for higher resolution but this could create more problems for a feature that&#039;s not really needed.  More storage for sure, but that&#039;s expected.  Perhaps a slight redesign but nothing too drastic.  Expect minor tweaks to the OS but nothing major.  It&#039;s simply too soon after the iphone 3g to do anything radical.  &lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;But bottom line, the Pre is the gadget of the year and makes the iphone (or any new iphone in July) look dated.  Comparisons of the upcoming Pre launch to the ill advised Storm&#039;s are laughable.  Those wanting a beginner&#039;s smartphone that is very simple or the itunes experience will want an iphone.  Those wanting more than that will look at the Pre.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>He meant the original iphone owners although if those owners didn&#8217;t switch to the iphone 3g by now, it&#8217;s doubtful they would be the types to switch to the more advanced Pre.</p>

<p>Some you crack me up though.  Sprint is much better than AT&amp;T, better quality, faster speed, more 3g coverage.  Not to mention better priced plans.  The iphone succeeds despite AT&amp;T..not because of AT&amp;T.  That&#8217;s a credit to the iphone.  If you think otherwise, then you&#8217;re not too bright but we do live in a nation of &#8220;not too bright.&#8221;</p>

<p>The Pre will be superior in its own way but won&#8217;t touch the itunes experience that apple offers.  Other compelling features as well as the missing basics that the iphone lacks will sell the Pre.  </p>

<p>Finally, apple won&#8217;t be releasing anything noteworthy in July.  Definitely not multitasking as there is no compelling need for it from users and would require much better hardware while alienating users of the iphone and iphone 3g.  </p>

<p>Rumors abound for higher resolution but this could create more problems for a feature that&#8217;s not really needed.  More storage for sure, but that&#8217;s expected.  Perhaps a slight redesign but nothing too drastic.  Expect minor tweaks to the OS but nothing major.  It&#8217;s simply too soon after the iphone 3g to do anything radical.  </p>

<p>But bottom line, the Pre is the gadget of the year and makes the iphone (or any new iphone in July) look dated.  Comparisons of the upcoming Pre launch to the ill advised Storm&#8217;s are laughable.  Those wanting a beginner&#8217;s smartphone that is very simple or the itunes experience will want an iphone.  Those wanting more than that will look at the Pre.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Blake 2</title>
		<link>http://www.theiphoneblog.com/2009/03/06/ceohsnap-mcnamee-june-iphone-owners-preverts/comment-page-1/#comment-34344</link>
		<dc:creator>Blake 2</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Mar 2009 16:01:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theiphoneblog.com/?p=7384#comment-34344</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Ummm yeah, I will not be getting a Pre. I guess I&#039;ll be waiting for &#039;one more thing&#039;.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ummm yeah, I will not be getting a Pre. I guess I&#8217;ll be waiting for &#8216;one more thing&#8217;.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

