Apple Releases HD Movie Purchases in iTunes
The word has gone out: Apple is now allowing you to do more than just rent movies in HD, they’re letting you buy them. You’re looking at spending a bit extra for the HD version – $19.99 to be precise. They’re pushing preorders for a few movies (Quantum of Solace and Twilight) but there are also a few you can buy right now (Saw V, for example. Sadists rejoice!).
The movies also come with an SD version bundled in for your iPhone and iPod. Which is great and all, but how’s-about Apple provide us with an iPhone that doesn’t need such primitive down-scaled resolutions. iPhone HD looking more likely to anyone? If it comes, we’re still doubting it would be the 720p that these videos come in (our money’s on iPhone HD with 480p), but it would be a sight better. We’re still hoping against hope here, but maybe 2009 could be the true “Year of HD,” …4 years late, but still very welcome.
March 19th, 2009 at 6:19 pm
I see zero need for HD on a mobile device.
March 19th, 2009 at 6:35 pm
$20 for an HD movie that is stuck on my computer, no thanks.
March 19th, 2009 at 6:40 pm
Sting7k u are absolutely right! Torrent anyone?
March 19th, 2009 at 6:42 pm
Or you buy the Blu-Ray for home, and get the Digital Copy (suitable for iPhone) free
March 19th, 2009 at 7:30 pm
“iPhone HD looking more likely to anyone?”
GRRRR! no!
any of the current, non-HD video clips that apple pushes out would still have more than enough resolution to satisfy a “480p” screen, which apple couldn’t market as “HD” because it ISN’T HD!
also comment #1 has it .. zero need for HD on a mobile device, at least when it comes to viewing video. for reading text it might help, a little, but for movies it is practically irrelevant at the physical dimensions of the iPhone.
March 19th, 2009 at 7:34 pm
oh yeah and storing an HD video clip on a device that can’t display HD video [480p is not HD] is wasteful, inefficient and stupid.
March 19th, 2009 at 8:14 pm
Valid points, but I think you guys are missing something: HD doesn’t mean 720p, and it isn’t just for video. It’s screen density and it’s screen real-estate. If you go back and check out our post on resolution independence, we go over the Nano already being 202dpi, the BlackBerry Bold already hitting 217dpi, and HTC already putting out 480×800px screens.
That’s a lot of space for writing, for surfacing the web, for using XLS sheets, and if it’s resolution independent, it’s a lot of depth for zooming out and getting bigger views.
And it’s clear like crystal.
HD is just a marketing term. TV is going HD. Cameras are going HD. iTunes is going HD. Maybe Apple will use that term, maybe not.
But as component prices fall and batteries get better, Apple will pull the switch on higher density (HD) iPhones.
I for one can’t wait. I want more on Mobile Safari, never mind iPod!
March 19th, 2009 at 8:14 pm
Also: NOT AVAILABLE IN CANADA
March 19th, 2009 at 9:37 pm
Erm. iPhone HD this summer : maybe.
me buying a 20 dollar file : Maybe not.
I’ll stick to what already works for me !! ^_^
March 20th, 2009 at 12:05 am
I think the iPhone HD looks more like a possibility, and likely will be announced in the summer but do I see any need for it? No.
March 20th, 2009 at 12:25 am
“HD doesn’t mean 720p, and it isn’t just for video.”
HD doesn’t mean 720p but it DOES mean at higher than standard definition which 480p really isn’t. that is, essentially, “standard definition”. and in my comment i did mention it’d help with text rendering but text already renders very well at small sizes on the current screen.
okay so spreadsheets will look better but this post isn’t about spreadsheets. it’s about video and putting HD video on a standard definition 480p device is silly and ridiculously inefficient.
of course higher resolution is going to happen eventually but you don’t see the Blackberry or HTC people calling their screens HD – because they aren’t HD.
March 20th, 2009 at 2:06 am
And here in sweden we are still waiting to be able to rent or buy any movies from iTunes.
March 20th, 2009 at 5:51 am
Hd on a handheld screen. LOL. Not to mention the monsterous file sizes…
March 25th, 2009 at 9:01 am
HD is actually a defined family of standards, not just a marketing term.
It comprises two possible screen resolutions: 1920×1080 or 1280×720. It also supports three frame rates: 24, 29.97 and 60 fps. And interlaced or progressive scan modes.