Comments on: Apple Releases HD Movie Purchases in iTunes

By: Geoff

Geoff — Wed, 25 Mar 2009 14:01:00 +0000

HD is actually a defined family of standards, not just a marketing term.

It comprises two possible screen resolutions: 1920x1080 or 1280x720. It also supports three frame rates: 24, 29.97 and 60 fps. And interlaced or progressive scan modes.

By: Paul

Paul — Fri, 20 Mar 2009 10:51:58 +0000

Hd on a handheld screen. LOL. Not to mention the monsterous file sizes…

By: Daniel A Johansson

Daniel A Johansson — Fri, 20 Mar 2009 07:06:41 +0000

And here in sweden we are still waiting to be able to rent or buy any movies from iTunes.

By: striatic

striatic — Fri, 20 Mar 2009 05:25:04 +0000

"HD doesn’t mean 720p, and it isn’t just for video."

HD doesn't mean 720p but it DOES mean at higher than standard definition which 480p really isn't. that is, essentially, "standard definition". and in my comment i did mention it'd help with text rendering but text already renders very well at small sizes on the current screen.

okay so spreadsheets will look better but this post isn't about spreadsheets. it's about video and putting HD video on a standard definition 480p device is silly and ridiculously inefficient.

of course higher resolution is going to happen eventually but you don't see the Blackberry or HTC people calling their screens HD - because they aren't HD.

By: Drew

Drew — Fri, 20 Mar 2009 05:05:42 +0000

I think the iPhone HD looks more like a possibility, and likely will be announced in the summer but do I see any need for it? No.

By: Omari James

Omari James — Fri, 20 Mar 2009 02:37:41 +0000

Erm. iPhone HD this summer : maybe.

me buying a 20 dollar file : Maybe not.

I'll stick to what already works for me !! ^_^

By: Rene Ritchie

Rene Ritchie — Fri, 20 Mar 2009 01:14:41 +0000

Also: NOT AVAILABLE IN CANADA

By: Rene Ritchie

Rene Ritchie — Fri, 20 Mar 2009 01:14:00 +0000

Valid points, but I think you guys are missing something: HD doesn't mean 720p, and it isn't just for video. It's screen density and it's screen real-estate. If you go back and check out our post on resolution independence, we go over the Nano already being 202dpi, the BlackBerry Bold already hitting 217dpi, and HTC already putting out 480x800px screens.

That's a lot of space for writing, for surfacing the web, for using XLS sheets, and if it's resolution independent, it's a lot of depth for zooming out and getting bigger views.

And it's clear like crystal.

HD is just a marketing term. TV is going HD. Cameras are going HD. iTunes is going HD. Maybe Apple will use that term, maybe not.

But as component prices fall and batteries get better, Apple will pull the switch on higher density (HD) iPhones.

I for one can't wait. I want more on Mobile Safari, never mind iPod!

By: striatic

striatic — Fri, 20 Mar 2009 00:34:49 +0000

oh yeah and storing an HD video clip on a device that can’t display HD video [480p is not HD] is wasteful, inefficient and stupid.

By: striatic

striatic — Fri, 20 Mar 2009 00:30:58 +0000

"iPhone HD looking more likely to anyone?"

GRRRR! no!

any of the current, non-HD video clips that apple pushes out would still have more than enough resolution to satisfy a "480p" screen, which apple couldn't market as "HD" because it ISN'T HD!

also comment #1 has it .. zero need for HD on a mobile device, at least when it comes to viewing video. for reading text it might help, a little, but for movies it is practically irrelevant at the physical dimensions of the iPhone.