<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: iPhone 3.0: Parental Controls May Change App Store Rejection Policies?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.theiphoneblog.com/2009/05/05/app-store-rejection-iphone-30/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.theiphoneblog.com/2009/05/05/app-store-rejection-iphone-30/</link>
	<description>For people who dare to Phone Different.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 23 Nov 2009 01:50:45 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Rob</title>
		<link>http://www.theiphoneblog.com/2009/05/05/app-store-rejection-iphone-30/comment-page-1/#comment-43977</link>
		<dc:creator>Rob</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 May 2009 08:27:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theiphoneblog.com/?p=8375#comment-43977</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;The newspaper concerned was the UK&#039;s The Sun. The breasts concerned were on page 3, a daily treat from a publication that tags itself as &#039;Britain&#039;s best family paper&#039;. Go figure.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The newspaper concerned was the UK&#8217;s The Sun. The breasts concerned were on page 3, a daily treat from a publication that tags itself as &#8216;Britain&#8217;s best family paper&#8217;. Go figure.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: dev</title>
		<link>http://www.theiphoneblog.com/2009/05/05/app-store-rejection-iphone-30/comment-page-1/#comment-43970</link>
		<dc:creator>dev</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 May 2009 06:21:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theiphoneblog.com/?p=8375#comment-43970</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;&quot;As long as Apple details what falls under particular ratings, there should be little reason for miscommunication&quot;&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Um, yeah, because Apple has such a good record of clearly communicating precise details with iPhone developers.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;As long as Apple details what falls under particular ratings, there should be little reason for miscommunication&#8221;</p>

<p>Um, yeah, because Apple has such a good record of clearly communicating precise details with iPhone developers.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sean Peters</title>
		<link>http://www.theiphoneblog.com/2009/05/05/app-store-rejection-iphone-30/comment-page-1/#comment-43957</link>
		<dc:creator>Sean Peters</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 May 2009 02:33:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theiphoneblog.com/?p=8375#comment-43957</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Oh, and how can we forget: NIN application: allows a user access to disturbing lyrics of one of the band&#039;s songs. Status: banned. Safari: allows a user to access Nazi hate sites, al Qaeda sites, any other hateful site you can think of, and oh by the way, the same lyrics as found in the NIN site. Status: all systems go!&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh, and how can we forget: NIN application: allows a user access to disturbing lyrics of one of the band&#8217;s songs. Status: banned. Safari: allows a user to access Nazi hate sites, al Qaeda sites, any other hateful site you can think of, and oh by the way, the same lyrics as found in the NIN site. Status: all systems go!</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sean Peters</title>
		<link>http://www.theiphoneblog.com/2009/05/05/app-store-rejection-iphone-30/comment-page-1/#comment-43956</link>
		<dc:creator>Sean Peters</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 May 2009 02:29:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theiphoneblog.com/?p=8375#comment-43956</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Umm, let me get this straight. Newspaper reader: allows a user to get a single image of a topless woman. Status: banned. Safari: allows a user to get as much hardcore porn as he/she wants. Status: clear for all users, baby! &lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;If there&#039;s a clearer example of why the app store approval process is completely hosed, I can&#039;t think of what it could be.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Umm, let me get this straight. Newspaper reader: allows a user to get a single image of a topless woman. Status: banned. Safari: allows a user to get as much hardcore porn as he/she wants. Status: clear for all users, baby! </p>

<p>If there&#8217;s a clearer example of why the app store approval process is completely hosed, I can&#8217;t think of what it could be.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dionte</title>
		<link>http://www.theiphoneblog.com/2009/05/05/app-store-rejection-iphone-30/comment-page-1/#comment-43949</link>
		<dc:creator>Dionte</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 May 2009 23:43:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theiphoneblog.com/?p=8375#comment-43949</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;yes, maybe after 3.0 zintin can come back, it was shut down by apple for having mature content&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>yes, maybe after 3.0 zintin can come back, it was shut down by apple for having mature content</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SimpleLeap Software</title>
		<link>http://www.theiphoneblog.com/2009/05/05/app-store-rejection-iphone-30/comment-page-1/#comment-43882</link>
		<dc:creator>SimpleLeap Software</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 May 2009 14:08:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theiphoneblog.com/?p=8375#comment-43882</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;@Steve I just don&#039;t think most of the companies/developers would even risk having their app rejected or being penalized by Apple by doing this. &lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;As long as Apple details what falls under particular ratings, there should be little reason for miscommunication&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Steve I just don&#8217;t think most of the companies/developers would even risk having their app rejected or being penalized by Apple by doing this. </p>

<p>As long as Apple details what falls under particular ratings, there should be little reason for miscommunication</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pj</title>
		<link>http://www.theiphoneblog.com/2009/05/05/app-store-rejection-iphone-30/comment-page-1/#comment-43881</link>
		<dc:creator>Pj</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 May 2009 14:03:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theiphoneblog.com/?p=8375#comment-43881</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;I think this would be a great idea and maybe open up the door for adult only apps and mature apps. If video games can do it so can the iPhone.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think this would be a great idea and maybe open up the door for adult only apps and mature apps. If video games can do it so can the iPhone.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steve</title>
		<link>http://www.theiphoneblog.com/2009/05/05/app-store-rejection-iphone-30/comment-page-1/#comment-43880</link>
		<dc:creator>Steve</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 May 2009 13:34:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theiphoneblog.com/?p=8375#comment-43880</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;But of Apple&#039;s reviewing the app, they&#039;re going to decide the rating anyway. Seems silly asking the developer to rate their own app. They&#039;re most likely always going to go easy on themselves.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Sorry, I thought he meant &lt;em&gt;customer&lt;/em&gt; reviewers.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>But of Apple&#8217;s reviewing the app, they&#8217;re going to decide the rating anyway. Seems silly asking the developer to rate their own app. They&#8217;re most likely always going to go easy on themselves.</p>

<p>Sorry, I thought he meant <em>customer</em> reviewers.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: sting7k</title>
		<link>http://www.theiphoneblog.com/2009/05/05/app-store-rejection-iphone-30/comment-page-1/#comment-43879</link>
		<dc:creator>sting7k</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 May 2009 13:26:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theiphoneblog.com/?p=8375#comment-43879</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;@Steve, to make apps blocked by the parental controls they would need to be classified or rated.  It&#039;s probably much easier to just have the developer say straight up when they submit their apps for review that it has mature content.  The reviewers then say yay or nay and assign that classification to be blocked by the parental controls.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Steve, to make apps blocked by the parental controls they would need to be classified or rated.  It&#8217;s probably much easier to just have the developer say straight up when they submit their apps for review that it has mature content.  The reviewers then say yay or nay and assign that classification to be blocked by the parental controls.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steve</title>
		<link>http://www.theiphoneblog.com/2009/05/05/app-store-rejection-iphone-30/comment-page-1/#comment-43878</link>
		<dc:creator>Steve</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 May 2009 13:12:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theiphoneblog.com/?p=8375#comment-43878</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Why wouldn&#039;t Apple just make certain apps inaccessible unless Parental Control is turned on in Settings? Why would Apple leave it up to developers and reviewers to decide?&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Why wouldn&#8217;t Apple just make certain apps inaccessible unless Parental Control is turned on in Settings? Why would Apple leave it up to developers and reviewers to decide?</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

