Friday Fun: Third Generation iPhone Rumors Diagramed!
TGRBlog (via iSpazio) has put together a graphical representations (above) of all the major third generation iPhone (iPhone 2,1) rumors, color-ranked by likelihood. Very nice!
Could WWDC be any closer…?


















June 5th, 2009 at 7:01 am
This is off topic, but im on my way to work and im stopping by sprint and yelling “iPhone FTW” at the top of my lungs at anyone waiting for the pre.
Whos joining me lol
June 5th, 2009 at 7:16 am
@iShirk: Don’t be an iJerk.
Pre will be yesterdays news though when the new iPhone is announced
June 5th, 2009 at 7:36 am
I hope they don’t call this thing the “iPhone Video”, no flow what so ever.
June 5th, 2009 at 7:47 am
nice diagram! Honestly as of now I just want that damn OS Update to come out ha
June 5th, 2009 at 8:05 am
I’ve seen this diagram a few days ago, this is old news to me.
June 5th, 2009 at 8:26 am
FM transmitter is unlikely? Why is it taking so long to put an FM radio in the iPhone? I use it at the gym and all the cardio TVs use an FM frequency. The FM transmitter would also allow me to play my iPhone wirelessly thru my car stereo, right?
June 5th, 2009 at 8:29 am
And Flash player unlikely? That also is a big hassle.
June 5th, 2009 at 8:43 am
@jtz5
I have the same thing at my gym. It seems silly to buy a $5.00 FM radio at Walmart when I have an iPhone!
Not 100% positive, but I think Flash is a licensing issue with Adobe.
June 5th, 2009 at 9:02 am
I get the feeling they are gonna let us down, once again
June 5th, 2009 at 9:03 am
@jtz5 as for FM Transmitter I believe it is for inbound. So that you can listen to the radio on your iPhone. I don’t believe it is the reverse. Given the bluetooth capability, using an outbound FM Transmitter would really be a step back as the quality is a lot less, and more frequent to get lost due to radio interference, from other vehicles stations with a close proximity. Not advisable.
June 5th, 2009 at 9:05 am
And about Flash, honestly… Flash is a resource hog. I used to be “Yay flash, why not on iPhone” but with all the JS Librarys, AJAX, we really have no need for it in my opinion. It’s quicker and easier.
June 5th, 2009 at 9:20 am
@dionte I kinda agree with you here.. All this hype, it will most surely make us dissapointed in some way
June 5th, 2009 at 9:43 am
we will see next Monday.
I don’t want to expect anything more than I already know from The 3.0 preview.
June 5th, 2009 at 10:26 am
@Richard, @jitz5 – An FM transmitter is by definition outbound. Inbound FM would be handled by a receiver. That said, if I could only have one, I’d prefer the receiver. I have yet to use a portable FM transmitter of quality.
June 5th, 2009 at 11:22 am
@Richard:
Re Flash: I cant wait for HTML5 support (already available in Firefox 3.5 Beta 4) to work its way to Safari.
That will drive a wooden stake thru Flash’s evil heart in 6 months flat, and because its open source, there will be options for controlling it.
June 5th, 2009 at 11:31 am
FM transmitters suck. You’re better off with Bluetooth or an Aux jack.
June 5th, 2009 at 12:50 pm
I agree flash is going under eventually so why include support when it will be useless sooner than later.
June 5th, 2009 at 12:57 pm
i need some NEW rumors!! i mean its only 2 and a half days away cant get any new leaks?????
June 5th, 2009 at 1:30 pm
@jojo well aren’t YOU fancy.
June 5th, 2009 at 1:41 pm
Can anyone recommend a Bluetooth device to send songs from my iPhone to my car stereo? I don’t have an Aux jack on the front of my stereo. Some manufacturers aren’t there yet (I have a Volvo).
Thanks. And yes, those FM transmitters are bad, but I was hoping Apple might get it right. I would rather have the FM receiver, tho.
June 5th, 2009 at 1:44 pm
If they spend precious space inside the new iPhone on an FM transmitter and make me pay for it when I buy one I’ll be almost angry!
June 6th, 2009 at 2:02 am
@CJ M well maybe iam fancy. =]