iPhone 3GS #1 in Consumer Reports New Smartphone Ratings

iphone_award

The latest piece of hardware to come out of Cupertino, Apple’s iPhone 3GS, has claimed the honor of being ranked number 1 in Consumer Reports new smartphone ratings. Now does this come as a surprise to anyone? In all actuality, it was pretty close within the top 8 devices: (Device/Overall Score):

  • iPhone 3GS (16 GB) 73
  • iPhone 3G (8 GB) 70
  • Samsung Omnia 69
  • BlackBerry Storm 69
  • HTC G1 69
  • BlackBerry Bold 69
  • Samsung Epix 69
  • Palm Pre 67

While the race to top honors was anything but a blow-out, the iPhone shined when it came to it’s 3.5-inch widescreen display, top of the line multimedia, ease of navigation, web browsing, and battery life. Devices like the Palm Pre, among others, beat out Apple’s gem when it came to messaging along with superior multitasking capabilities.

So the iPhone ranked number 1 this year as it did almost two years ago, congratulations goes out to Apple for a continuing job well done!

Update – We love our friends over at PreCentral.net so to be fair we wanted to let it be known the Palm Pre did not come in last place, we simply just cut the list off after the Pre. For the full list please visit the Consumer Reports site.

[Thanks to everyone who sent this in!]


You might like these related TiPb stories:

20 Responses to “iPhone 3GS #1 in Consumer Reports New Smartphone Ratings”

  1. Jeffdc5 Says:

    Ohh boy here comes the pre hate why did you have to mention it?

  2. d.allen Says:

    With all the Pre talk, I’m surprised that it finished last.. Good job to apple for having the top two, when only being in the market for 3 years.

  3. Adam Says:

    I’m surprised that Pre was last, it opened to very little disappointment! But I guess the people who actually use it don’t like it as much as the gadget blogs do :P

    iPhone is always on top of customer satisfaction. See, people argue about which phone is the ‘best’, and I think these surveys tell you, because it’s really about how satisfied you are with the device. You can’t deny these numbers.

  4. Dexter Says:

    We all knew the iPhone pawns the Pre, why did we need numbers to tell us?

  5. Poop Smells Good Says:

    I get Consumer Reports monthly. One month they rated the Black Berry Storm a “CR Best Buy”. There other instances where they gave a product a good rating which I knew from experience wasn’t top tier.

    Although I do believe the 3Gs is a top tier phone, I don’t put much stock into what Consumer Reports has to say about electronic gadgets, computers, etc.

  6. Ericg1840 Says:

    I can’t believe that they ranked the samsung omnia so high that phone is junk. I thought Verizon stopped selling it anyway cause of how bad it was

  7. Jeremy Sikora Says:

    Just so everyone knows, I simply stopped at the Palm Pre. So please don’t think it was dead last. I will update to mention there were more than 8 devices on the list. ;)

  8. cardfan Says:

    I had posted them over at precentral but took em down. Never know if CR will have a fit. As a fan of both phones, i can only say they didn’t seem very consistent at all.

    Example: Messaging on the Pre integrates IM and should easily earn a top mark. It didn’t. While the iphone is held up because AT&T hasn’t implemented MMS.

    Example 2: “Voicing” received higher on the iphone 3GS vs the iphone 3G. Huh?

    1. Only the display on the iphones grabbed top score. The Pre is pretty sharp IMO. Navigation isn’t in this category if you’re worried about it being as smooth as iphone.

    I’d still put the iphone 3GS on top (easily) if i were doing a similar rankings, but CR clearly needs to stick to rating appliances :)

  9. VDR Says:

    I think this report is BS, since Blackberry Curve 8900 isn’t even in the list and there’s no way the Bold ranks higher than the Curve 8900.

  10. Jeremy Sikora Says:

    @VDR, the 8900 is on the complete list but to view it you have to go to Consumer Reports web site. As stated in the post we only listed the top 8 devices. And I’d take a Bold over the 8900 simply for 3G.

  11. VDR Says:

    @Jeremy, thanks for the tip, that explains why there are only 8 phones on the above list.

  12. icebike Says:

    @Smells Good:

    There other instances where they gave a product a good rating which I knew from experience wasn’t top tier.

    I’ve always thought that CS was good at rating canned peas.

    Anything technical, not so much.

  13. Waidt Says:

    Come on, Tipb, what are you – a bunch of kids? So you chopped the list of at the Pre without explaining this, then you act surprised when people assume it came in last. I’ve been seeing this kind of incompetence a bit on your site. Try to be more attentive than a 16 yr old.

    And Consumer Reports? What do they really know about anything? My 3GS is far superior to my 3G. I appreciate it’s responsiveness and crashlessness (aka stability) more and more with each passing day. OS 3.1 just makes it even sweeter.

  14. Waidt Says:

    Ok, ok: ‘TiPb’ and ‘off’ were what i meant. Sorry if I offended.

    BTW, why was the volume so low on your otherwise very nice Wed night podcast? And why can I not listen live on my iPhone? It just seems funny that a livecast stream about the iPhone can’t be listened to on the device itself. Or am I missing something here?

  15. Truth Says:

    Consumer Reports reviews are just as crappy as the CNET ones except with CR you have to pay to look at the reviews.

  16. Poop Smells Good Says:

    @Truth: I totally agree…..your name says it all.

    @ice: You hit the nail on the head. CR isn’t even good for toilet paper. The pages are too glossy. :-)

  17. Waidt Says:

    @Waidt Maybe you should try reading the original post more closely before sounding off. I think Jeremy clearly said the list was of the “top 8 devices”.

    Now, what was it you were saying about incompetency and 16 yr old inattentiveness?

  18. Bryan Says:

    Funny how they are mostly touch screen devices near the top. I guess that’s the wave of the future.

  19. will54880 Says:

    At risk of getting ripped apart, I do believe the Pre is a better device than the iPhone. As one website stated, OSX left alot out of it, and WebOS filled in the gaps. Plus, WebOS is not locked down like OSX is by Apple. And, you don’t have to put up with at&t. I have used both devices, in case you are wondering. Pre > iPhone IMO.

  20. dsjr2006 Says:

    Haha. The Pre can’t even do half the things the iPhone can do so it surely didn’t fill in any gaps. Sprint is worse than At&t and I would have to say the Pre is actually more locked down since they have the ability to force software updates on you to remove things if they want. Not to mention you can’t do anything 3rd party with the Pre right now without getting into complex command-line. LMAO, get your facts straight.

Leave a Reply