<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>The iPhone Blog &#187; iphoney</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.theiphoneblog.com/tag/iphoney/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.theiphoneblog.com</link>
	<description>For people who dare to Phone Different.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 22 Nov 2009 21:58:41 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Friday Fun Fake: iPhoney Nano</title>
		<link>http://www.theiphoneblog.com/2009/02/27/friday-fun-fake-iphoney-nano/</link>
		<comments>http://www.theiphoneblog.com/2009/02/27/friday-fun-fake-iphoney-nano/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 28 Feb 2009 04:03:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Rene Ritchie</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[iphoney]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nano]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theiphoneblog.com/?p=7300</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[

Apple has confirmed repeatedly that they&#8217;re not going to make an iPhone nano. So while that means they may or may not, it definitely means the knock-off artists are making them. Register Hardware brings us this little gem:


  The Mini&#8217;s touchscreen in resistive rather than capacitive, a choice no doubt partly dictated by cost [...]<p>This is a story by <a href="http://theiphoneblog.com">the iPhone Blog</a>.  This feed is sponsored by <a href="http://store.theiphoneblog.com">The iPhone Blog Store</a>.<br/><br/><a href="http://www.theiphoneblog.com/2009/02/27/friday-fun-fake-iphoney-nano/">Friday Fun Fake: iPhoney Nano</a></p>
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://www.theiphoneblog.com/images/stories/2009/02/iphoney_1jpg.jpeg" alt="" title="iphoney_1jpg" width="242" height="394" class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-7301" /></p>

<p>Apple has confirmed repeatedly that they&#8217;re not going to make an iPhone nano. So while that means they may or may not, it definitely means the knock-off artists are making them. <a href="http://www.reghardware.co.uk/2009/02/26/review_iphoney_mini/">Register Hardware</a> brings us this little gem:</p>

<blockquote>
  <p>The Mini&#8217;s touchscreen in resistive rather than capacitive, a choice no doubt partly dictated by cost and partly by the need to use a stylus to type on the diminutive virtual Qwerty keyboard which only appears in portrait mode. That&#8217;s not to say you actually have to use the stylus – after some practice we managed to finger-type with around a 60 per cent chance of getting the right letter the first time.</p>
</blockquote>

<p>Anyone racing over to get one?</p>

<p>[Thanks to Icebike for the tip!]</p>
<p>This is a story by <a href="http://theiphoneblog.com">the iPhone Blog</a>.  This feed is sponsored by <a href="http://store.theiphoneblog.com">The iPhone Blog Store</a>.<br /><br /><a href="http://www.theiphoneblog.com/2009/02/27/friday-fun-fake-iphoney-nano/">Friday Fun Fake: iPhoney Nano</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.theiphoneblog.com/2009/02/27/friday-fun-fake-iphoney-nano/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>8</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>iPhone UK Advertisement Banned For Misleading Consumers</title>
		<link>http://www.theiphoneblog.com/2008/08/27/iphone-uk-advertisement-banned-for-misleading-consumers/</link>
		<comments>http://www.theiphoneblog.com/2008/08/27/iphone-uk-advertisement-banned-for-misleading-consumers/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Aug 2008 14:00:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Casey Chan</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[asa]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[banned]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[commercial]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[iphoney]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[misleading]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[uk]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theiphoneblog.com/?p=4005</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[

The Advertising Standards Authority, which we at TiPb are going to (foolishly) assume is the executive power of advertisements across the pond, has deemed an iPhone Advertisement as misleading in the UK. The sticking point? When Apple said:
&#8220;&#8230;all the parts of the internet are on the iPhone.&#8221;
And well, we know that isn&#8217;t exactly true. We still [...]<p>This is a story by <a href="http://theiphoneblog.com">the iPhone Blog</a>.  This feed is sponsored by <a href="http://store.theiphoneblog.com">The iPhone Blog Store</a>.<br/><br/><a href="http://www.theiphoneblog.com/2008/08/27/iphone-uk-advertisement-banned-for-misleading-consumers/">iPhone UK Advertisement Banned For Misleading Consumers</a></p>
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><span style="underline;"><a href="http://www.theiphoneblog.com/images/stories/2008/08/800px-flag_of_the_united_kingdomsvg.png"></a><a href="http://www.theiphoneblog.com/images/stories/2008/08/iphoney.jpg"><img class="aligncenter size-medium wp-image-4007" src="http://www.theiphoneblog.com/images/stories/2008/08/iphoney.jpg" alt="" width="400" height="266" /></a></span></p>

<p>The Advertising Standards Authority, which we at TiPb are going to (foolishly) assume is the executive power of advertisements across the pond, has deemed an iPhone Advertisement as misleading in the UK. The sticking point? When Apple said:
<blockquote>&#8220;&#8230;all the parts of the internet are on the iPhone.&#8221;</blockquote>
And well, we know that isn&#8217;t <em>exactly</em> true. We still don&#8217;t have Flash or Java support on our iPhone and Flash and Java are a pretty big part of the internet. Apple claims that the advertisement implied the availability of webpages, rather than their specific appearance. Which honestly sounds like a cop out to us. But still, pulling the advertisement seems a bit excessive.</p>

<p>We think to please the guvnuhs on the other side, Apple will probably throw in one of them fine prints across the bottom of the page that specifies on what technology you &#8216;really&#8217; do get. Does anyone know if Apple makes the same claim on the US commercials? Methinks yes.</p>

<p><em>Thanks Lee Richards!</em>
</p><p class="read"><a href="http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/technology/7582197.stm">Read</a></p>
<p>This is a story by <a href="http://theiphoneblog.com">the iPhone Blog</a>.  This feed is sponsored by <a href="http://store.theiphoneblog.com">The iPhone Blog Store</a>.<br /><br /><a href="http://www.theiphoneblog.com/2008/08/27/iphone-uk-advertisement-banned-for-misleading-consumers/">iPhone UK Advertisement Banned For Misleading Consumers</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.theiphoneblog.com/2008/08/27/iphone-uk-advertisement-banned-for-misleading-consumers/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

