<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>The iPhone Blog &#187; lock down</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.theiphoneblog.com/tag/lock-down/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.theiphoneblog.com</link>
	<description>For people who dare to Phone Different.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 22 Nov 2009 21:58:41 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>iTunes 8.2 Pre-Release 2: Now Available, Blocks Carrier File Change</title>
		<link>http://www.theiphoneblog.com/2009/05/06/itunes-82-prerelease-2-blocks-carrier-file-change/</link>
		<comments>http://www.theiphoneblog.com/2009/05/06/itunes-82-prerelease-2-blocks-carrier-file-change/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 May 2009 04:04:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Rene Ritchie</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[3.0]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[8.2]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[carrier file]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[iphone 3.0]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[iphone OS 3.0]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[itunes 8.2]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[lock down]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mms]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tethering]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theiphoneblog.com/?p=8398</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[

Along with iPhone 3.0 Beta 5, which appears to hide away MMS functionality for AT&#38;T, Apple also seeded the second pre-release version of iTunes 8.2, which looks like it blocks editing of the iPhone carrier file. In previous beta releases, developers were able to use the carrier file to enable tethering, something built into iPhone [...]<p>This is a story by <a href="http://theiphoneblog.com">the iPhone Blog</a>.  This feed is sponsored by <a href="http://store.theiphoneblog.com">The iPhone Blog Store</a>.<br/><br/><a href="http://www.theiphoneblog.com/2009/05/06/itunes-82-prerelease-2-blocks-carrier-file-change/">iTunes 8.2 Pre-Release 2: Now Available, Blocks Carrier File Change</a></p>
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href='http://www.theiphoneblog.com/images/stories/2009/03/itunes_no_hdcp_hd_for_you.jpg'><img src="http://www.theiphoneblog.com/images/stories/2009/03/itunes_no_hdcp_hd_for_you-400x309.jpg" alt="" title="itunes_no_hdcp_hd_for_you" width="400" height="309" class="aligncenter size-medium wp-image-7645" /></a></p>

<p>Along with <a href="http://www.theiphoneblog.com/2009/03/23/preview-iphone-os-30-beta-1-software-walkthrough/">iPhone 3.0</a> <a href="http://www.theiphoneblog.com/2009/05/06/iphone-30-beta-develpers/">Beta 5</a>, which appears to hide away MMS functionality for AT&amp;T, Apple also seeded the second pre-release version of iTunes 8.2, which looks like it blocks editing of the iPhone carrier file. In previous beta releases, developers were able to use the carrier file to <a href="http://www.theiphoneblog.com/2009/03/18/iphone-30-tethering-enabled/">enable tethering</a>, something built into iPhone 3.0 by Apple but entirely dependent on as-yet-not-given carrier approval.</p>

<p>Did AT&amp;T ask for the new lockdown? Perhaps the MMS stripping as well? Nothing but speculation so far&#8230;</p>

<p>(Thanks Andrew for the tip!)</p>
<p>This is a story by <a href="http://theiphoneblog.com">the iPhone Blog</a>.  This feed is sponsored by <a href="http://store.theiphoneblog.com">The iPhone Blog Store</a>.<br /><br /><a href="http://www.theiphoneblog.com/2009/05/06/itunes-82-prerelease-2-blocks-carrier-file-change/">iTunes 8.2 Pre-Release 2: Now Available, Blocks Carrier File Change</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.theiphoneblog.com/2009/05/06/itunes-82-prerelease-2-blocks-carrier-file-change/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>16</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>UPDATED: iPod shuffle Signaling Apple Switch to Locked-Down Headphones?</title>
		<link>http://www.theiphoneblog.com/2009/03/15/ipod-shuffle-signaling-apple-switch-lockeddown-headphones/</link>
		<comments>http://www.theiphoneblog.com/2009/03/15/ipod-shuffle-signaling-apple-switch-lockeddown-headphones/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Mar 2009 03:24:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Rene Ritchie</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[iPod]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[headset]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ipod shuffle]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[lock down]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[scandal]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theiphoneblog.com/?p=7522</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[

UPDATED: ZDNet retorts, and says to chill. 

ORIGINAL: iLounge (via Engadget) is reporting that the new iPod shuffle ships with headsets that not only include advanced (read: complicated) on-wire controls, but with lock-down chips that may prevent third parties from making compatible alternatives without ponying up licensing fees to Apple. Whether this is a money [...]<p>This is a story by <a href="http://theiphoneblog.com">the iPhone Blog</a>.  This feed is sponsored by <a href="http://store.theiphoneblog.com">The iPhone Blog Store</a>.<br/><br/><a href="http://www.theiphoneblog.com/2009/03/15/ipod-shuffle-signaling-apple-switch-lockeddown-headphones/">UPDATED: iPod shuffle Signaling Apple Switch to Locked-Down Headphones?</a></p>
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://www.theiphoneblog.com/images/stories/2009/03/ipod_shuffle_lock_down.jpg" alt="" title="ipod_shuffle_lock_down" width="500" height="279" class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-7524" /></p>

<p>UPDATED: <a href="http://community.zdnet.co.uk/blog/0,1000000567,10012351o-2000331777b,00.htm">ZDNet retorts</a>, and says to chill. </p>

<p>ORIGINAL: <a href="http://www.ilounge.com/index.php/reviews/entry/apple-ipod-shuffle-third-generation/P6">iLounge</a> (via <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2009/03/15/third-party-ipod-shuffle-headphones-will-require-apple-licensed/">Engadget</a>) is reporting that the new <a href="http://www.theiphoneblog.com/2009/03/11/apple-updates-shuffle-4gb-voiceover/">iPod shuffle</a> ships with headsets that not only include advanced (read: complicated) on-wire controls, but with lock-down chips that may prevent third parties from making compatible alternatives without ponying up licensing fees to Apple. Whether this is a <strike>money grab</strike> in exchange for technology Apple has patented and feels they deserve compensation for, or just another internet controversy that ultimately goes nowhere isn&#8217;t fully understood yet (least not by me!). iLounge says:</p>

<blockquote>
  <p>This is, in short, a nightmare scenario for long-time iPod fans: are we entering a world in which Apple controls and taxes literally every piece of the iPod purchase from headphones to chargers, jacking up their prices, forcing customers to re-purchase things they already own, while making only marginal improvements in their functionality? It’s a shame, and one that consumers should feel empowered to fight.</p>
</blockquote>

<p>When the iPhone 3G came out, there was some noise that the new component and composite video cables that came along with it contained <a href="http://www.theiphoneblog.com/2007/09/07/video-out-on-new-ipods-now-restricted/">proprietary chips</a> that would prevent 3rd parties from creating cheaper alternatives to the Apple-proper cables.</p>

<p>Launched along with the 2nd generation iPod touch was Apple&#8217;s new <a href="http://www.theiphoneblog.com/2009/01/13/review-apple-inear-headphones-remote-mic/">in-ear headset with mic and remote</a> control, allowing music to be started, stopped, and skipped, along with volume to be controlled right on the headset. They worked not only with the iPod touch, but with the new aluminum unibody MacBook family, and to a lesser degree with the iPhone 3G. Was there a proprietary lock-down chip in those headsets?</p>

<p>Either way, are we sharpening our pitchforks and lighting our torches, or waiting to see how this develops before storming the streets of Cupertino?</p>
<p>This is a story by <a href="http://theiphoneblog.com">the iPhone Blog</a>.  This feed is sponsored by <a href="http://store.theiphoneblog.com">The iPhone Blog Store</a>.<br /><br /><a href="http://www.theiphoneblog.com/2009/03/15/ipod-shuffle-signaling-apple-switch-lockeddown-headphones/">UPDATED: iPod shuffle Signaling Apple Switch to Locked-Down Headphones?</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.theiphoneblog.com/2009/03/15/ipod-shuffle-signaling-apple-switch-lockeddown-headphones/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>14</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

