<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>The iPhone Blog &#187; regulation</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.theiphoneblog.com/tag/regulation/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.theiphoneblog.com</link>
	<description>For people who dare to Phone Different.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 22 Nov 2009 21:58:41 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Should the iPhone Have a Removable Battery? The EU Says Yes!</title>
		<link>http://www.theiphoneblog.com/2008/10/08/should-the-iphone-have-a-removable-battery-the-eu-says-yes/</link>
		<comments>http://www.theiphoneblog.com/2008/10/08/should-the-iphone-have-a-removable-battery-the-eu-says-yes/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Oct 2008 09:55:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Rene Ritchie</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[batteries]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[eu]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[europe]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[regulation]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theiphoneblog.com/?p=4812</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[

The European Union is known to be a little more hard core than North American regulators. Just ask Microsoft about their Windows monopoly fines, or Apple about iTunes pricing and DRM. Now, however, Apple Insider reports that the EU might just be getting ready to fire another shot across Apple&#8217;s bow with a &#8220;New Batteries [...]<p>This is a story by <a href="http://theiphoneblog.com">the iPhone Blog</a>.  This feed is sponsored by <a href="http://store.theiphoneblog.com">The iPhone Blog Store</a>.<br/><br/><a href="http://www.theiphoneblog.com/2008/10/08/should-the-iphone-have-a-removable-battery-the-eu-says-yes/">Should the iPhone Have a Removable Battery? The EU Says Yes!</a></p>
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://www.theiphoneblog.com/images/stories/2008/05/iphone_solar_power_patent1.jpg" alt="iPhone Power!" /></p>

<p>The European Union is known to be a little more hard core than North American regulators. Just ask Microsoft about their Windows monopoly fines, or Apple about iTunes pricing and DRM. Now, however, <a href="http://www.appleinsider.com/articles/08/10/06/new_eu_directive_pushes_toward_replaceable_iphone_batteries.html">Apple Insider</a> reports that the EU might just be getting ready to fire another shot across Apple&#8217;s bow with a &#8220;New Batteries Directive&#8221; that says power cells must be &#8220;readily removable&#8221;:</p>

<blockquote>Gary Nevison, writing for New Electronics, said [PDF] &#8220;the requirement is clearly intended to ensure that users can remove batteries by opening a cover by hand or after removal of one or two screws. The producer will also have to provide the user with details on how to remove the battery safely.&#8221;</blockquote>

<p>Of course, Apple and their design guru, Jonathan Ive, have long weighed the extra juice &#8212; and clean lines &#8212; of a single, integrated unit, so this may cause no end of frustrations in Cupertino. (Though the iPhone 3G does, of course, sport two new screws at the bottom, the battery removable process could still never be mistaken for &#8220;ready&#8221;).</p>

<p>What do you think? Removable batteries a plus for consumers and the environment? Or a harbinger of less sleek, less iconic iPhone designs? Is it better to look good, or be good?</p>
<p>This is a story by <a href="http://theiphoneblog.com">the iPhone Blog</a>.  This feed is sponsored by <a href="http://store.theiphoneblog.com">The iPhone Blog Store</a>.<br /><br /><a href="http://www.theiphoneblog.com/2008/10/08/should-the-iphone-have-a-removable-battery-the-eu-says-yes/">Should the iPhone Have a Removable Battery? The EU Says Yes!</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.theiphoneblog.com/2008/10/08/should-the-iphone-have-a-removable-battery-the-eu-says-yes/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>11</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>US Legislation:  You Have the Right to&#8230; Unlock Your iPhone?</title>
		<link>http://www.theiphoneblog.com/2008/02/27/us-legislation-you-have-the-right-to-unlock-your-iphone/</link>
		<comments>http://www.theiphoneblog.com/2008/02/27/us-legislation-you-have-the-right-to-unlock-your-iphone/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Feb 2008 20:14:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Rene Ritchie</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[regulation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[unlock]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[usa]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theiphoneblog.com/2008/02/27/us-legislation-you-have-the-right-to-unlock-your-iphone/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[

Representative Ed Mackey (D-Mass) wants to make Apple &#038; ATT (and all other US providers) cry. How? By copying the French. Well, technically, by adopting a law similar to France&#8217;s which mandates that cell companies &#8220;shall offer to consumers the opportunity to purchase subsidy-free wireless customer equipment.&#8221;

Under this proposal, Apple &#038; ATT would likely be [...]<p>This is a story by <a href="http://theiphoneblog.com">the iPhone Blog</a>.  This feed is sponsored by <a href="http://store.theiphoneblog.com">The iPhone Blog Store</a>.<br/><br/><a href="http://www.theiphoneblog.com/2008/02/27/us-legislation-you-have-the-right-to-unlock-your-iphone/">US Legislation:  You Have the Right to&#8230; Unlock Your iPhone?</a></p>
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p align="center"><img alt="unlocked_by_gov.jpg" src="http://phonedifferent.com/articleimages/2008/02/unlocked_by_gov.jpg" width="360" height="223" /></p>

<p>Representative Ed Mackey (D-Mass) wants to make Apple &#038; ATT (and all other US providers) cry. How? By copying the French. Well, technically, by adopting <a href="http://phonedifferent.com/2007/11/iphone_launches_in_france_toni.html">a law similar to France</a>&#8217;s which mandates that cell companies &#8220;shall offer to consumers the opportunity to purchase subsidy-free wireless customer equipment.&#8221;</p>

<p>Under this proposal, Apple &#038; ATT would likely be forced to offer an unlocked (and unsubsidized) version of the iPhone. (Bidding to start at US$999?)</p>

<p>Potentially worse for the telcos, it would mandate a level of clarity, detail, and (gasp!) understandability for rate plans, including itemization and disclosure of taxes and early termination fees.</p>

<p><a href="http://www.news.com/8301-10784_3-9879554-7.html?part=rss&#038;subj=news&#038;tag=2547-1040_3-0-10">Hit up news.com for the details&#8230;</a></p>
<p>This is a story by <a href="http://theiphoneblog.com">the iPhone Blog</a>.  This feed is sponsored by <a href="http://store.theiphoneblog.com">The iPhone Blog Store</a>.<br /><br /><a href="http://www.theiphoneblog.com/2008/02/27/us-legislation-you-have-the-right-to-unlock-your-iphone/">US Legislation:  You Have the Right to&#8230; Unlock Your iPhone?</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.theiphoneblog.com/2008/02/27/us-legislation-you-have-the-right-to-unlock-your-iphone/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

