<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>The iPhone Blog &#187; search engine</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.theiphoneblog.com/tag/search-engine/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.theiphoneblog.com</link>
	<description>For people who dare to Phone Different.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 22 Nov 2009 21:58:41 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Apple Building Their Own Search Engine?</title>
		<link>http://www.theiphoneblog.com/2008/11/16/apple-building-search-engine/</link>
		<comments>http://www.theiphoneblog.com/2008/11/16/apple-building-search-engine/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 16 Nov 2008 13:00:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Rene Ritchie</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Rumors]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Apple]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[search]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[search engine]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theiphoneblog.com/?p=5458</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[

The intertubes are a flood with rumors that Apple may be building their own search engine. Does this mean they&#8217;re going into competition with Microsoft Live! Search? With Yahoo!? With Google?! (After all, Google went into competition with Apple in the smartphone market!)

Probably not, according to TechCrunch:

The answer is they’re not. But the rumors persist, [...]<p>This is a story by <a href="http://theiphoneblog.com">the iPhone Blog</a>.  This feed is sponsored by <a href="http://store.theiphoneblog.com">The iPhone Blog Store</a>.<br/><br/><a href="http://www.theiphoneblog.com/2008/11/16/apple-building-search-engine/">Apple Building Their Own Search Engine?</a></p>
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://www.theiphoneblog.com/images/stories/2008/08/apple_exceeds_google_market_cap.jpg" alt="" title="apple_exceeds_google_market_cap" width="500" height="346" class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-3792" /></p>

<p>The intertubes are a flood with rumors that Apple may be building their own search engine. Does this mean they&#8217;re going into competition with Microsoft Live! Search? With Yahoo!? With Google?! (After all, Google went into <a href="http://www.androidcentral.com">competition</a> with Apple in the smartphone market!)</p>

<p>Probably not, according to <a href="http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/11/13/is-apple-building-a-search-engine/">TechCrunch</a>:</p>

<blockquote>The answer is they’re not. But the rumors persist, and we believe they have a nugget of truth. Here’s what we think is really going on: Apple doesn’t like the search experience on its mobile devices, and may be building a radically different user experience which is much more visual than exists today. It will likely still be powered by Google results, but Apple may present it in a very different way that suits mobile users much better.</blockquote>

<p>Apple&#8217;s already proven with the iPhone Map application that they can produce absolutely killer front-ends for Google&#8217;s data pipes, could they do the same for search? And what would it be like?</p>
<p>This is a story by <a href="http://theiphoneblog.com">the iPhone Blog</a>.  This feed is sponsored by <a href="http://store.theiphoneblog.com">The iPhone Blog Store</a>.<br /><br /><a href="http://www.theiphoneblog.com/2008/11/16/apple-building-search-engine/">Apple Building Their Own Search Engine?</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.theiphoneblog.com/2008/11/16/apple-building-search-engine/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

